This site not been updated since 2006.

There is a new and improved website in preparation at http://homepages.phonecoop.coop/eno-swales

 If you want to know when the site is significantly updated send an email to edenhope@riseup.net with ‘Update’ in the subject line.

 

 

EDENHOPE DESIGN AND SELF BUILD

AN ENVIRONMENTALLY AND FINANCIALLY AFFORDABLE HOUSE IN S. SCOTLAND

The site, which we bought in March 2001, lies in the Scottish Borders, on the north slopes of the Yarrow Water and six miles west of Selkirk.

The half acre site is set in a remnant of plantation woodland, faces south and lies on glacial moraine composed of a very free draining mix of boulders, gravels, sands and clays.

Across the valley to the south we face Black Andrew Wood, with views west and east along the Yarrow valley. Sheltering us from the north are the mixed woodlands of Hangingshaw and above this is the Southern Upland Way, a long distance route running from the Irish Sea to the North Sea.

View of plot and its setting from the opposite side of the Yarrow valley (January 2001)

It’s a lovely position but there are a number of practical constraints to building here. The site lies c. 1km down the beech lined East avenue to Hangingshaw House and over a bridge with a 7 tonne loading limit.

The wooded site slopes steeply to the south and east so that there is a 6-7 metre difference in level from the track at the bottom to the top of the site. There is no room for a large level storage area, there is no water on site, the track to the site is narrow and there is no turning room for delivery trucks.

To solve the immediate water supply requirements, we set up a shed with roof rainwater collection into 1500 litre drums. We are able occasionally to use a neighbour’s otherwise closed access from the west thus avoiding the bridge, deliveries, however, have to be very carefully arranged, taking account of weight, wagon size, nature of the materials and method of unloading and we were very lucky to be able to store materials in another neighbour’s barn..

The house design is based on a concept developed by Gokai Deveci (Robert Gordon University) in the late 90’s and the then Scottish Homes, to be a financially and environmentally affordable house with low running costs and built of commodity materials.

Drawing 1. Very simple rectangular one and half storey design, facing due south, with central glazed area, clad in wood and slated.

Several similar houses have already been built in Aberdeenshire. We need a cheap house to run and maintain because our pensions will be minuscule! It will be off-grid and no mains services. We have ended up with a design which is better than carbon neutral in construction and occupation. And if it was already available, we would not be building it ourselves!

Environmentally affordable is a good area for discussion. As the TV series, Grand Designs has shown – there are different interpretations. Probably the best of the designs was Ben’s house built from the woods materials around him. If only!

 

For us, environmental affordability includes using sustainable, recycled and local materials, minimising the energy capital (amount of energy used in cradle to grave analysis of the materials); minimising health threatening toxins (e.g. formaldehyde glue in manufactured boards) etc. We are also using materials which ‘carbon bank’ thus contributing towards offsetting the carbon used in any manufacturing energy.

However, there are inevitably trade-offs and compromises, not least because we are working within a society which places a low value on these concepts at present. This makes it quite difficult, for example, to source the most appropriate building components because often no-one in the UK distributes them at sensible prices. On the European mainland the opposite is the case.

***********

Edenhope is a zero-heating design which means it doesn’t have to have a dedicated space heating system. Instead it is designed to retain all its heat by being super-insulated and airtight (i.e no draughts!). There will be a very small junk mail-burning stove however. The main heating comes from passive solar (south-facing glazing), people (400w each), lighting and running domestic appliances. In summer, there is more likely to be a problem with over-heating. A heat recovery ventilation system helps regulate the internal environment.

With no mains water nearby and a borehole supply estimated to cost about £7000 we have gone for roof collected rainwater with a series of filters and UV steriliser for potable water and provision for using re-cycled cleaned up (with wee reed beds) water for toilet flushing, etc. This was one of several matters which caused Building Control and us some challenges. Eventually they agreed providing we install a 25,000 litre tank. We demonstrated that if it had been in use for the last 30 yrs it would never have run out.

Electricity connection would be at least £3000. Instead of paying Powergen, we will build-in off-grid photovoltaic generation.

The house is about 200 sq m floor space (100 sq m per storey) and sits on a cellar (or undercroft) of c. 100sq m cut into the slope of the land. This gives us the space for the water storage, battery storage and a workshop.

The construction stages are:

  1. Decide where on the site the house is going, dig out a hole in the sloping site, c. 14m x 12m, level it and peg out for foundations
  2. Make the foundations and on them, build the undercroft.
  3. Pre-assemble the walls and roof elements on the floored undercroft
  4. Erect the house, make wind and water tight
  5. Install electricity, water and sewerage.
  6. Finish internal and ground works

 

Stage 1. Looking down into the undercroft hole, foundation trenches laid out and piles of sieved and washed gravel won from the site spoil.

Devichi’s design is based on a timber frame building system called Masonite. It uses engineered timber I-beams which are commonly used in floor joists because they have a very good strength to weight ratio.

Masonite ‘I’ beams make good use of small timber and the waste wood generated from milling processes.

View looking up into roof and showing a close-up of timber I beam structure - wall studs, rafters and floor joists.

The beams come in standard lengths so we dimensioned the house to fit the 9m and 12m lengths although we did have to cut about 500 shorter pieces for dwangs, rafters, wall studs etc. The beams are so light that even the 12m beams are easy for 2 people to carry.

The walls and roof are of a fairly standard breathable design, i.e. vapour resistance decreases from inside to the outside. This means that moisture can move out without condensing on any cold surfaces thus avoiding the potential for causing rotting of any materials.

The frame is sheathed outside with 10mm Panelvent and 6mm Paneline inside. Both are compressed fibre boards similar to hardboard but thicker and glueless. The fibres are compressed and the heat and pressure bind the fibres by using the natural resins.

The foundations (reinforced concrete) and undercroft (walls of concrete blocks) are the only elements which use a fairly high embodied energy. This was minimised by using 1200mm x 500mm deep trenches rather than a full span concrete raft for the foundation and sifting and washing by hand, about 25 tonnes of sand and aggregate from the site.

Stage 3. Undercroft walls with row of pillars about 1/3rd way from back wall. These will support the roof ridge beam. Ground level at top right is at cellar floor level, and bottom left corner is at ground floor level of the house.

Once the undercroft was built and the joists laid and floored we had the large level area or "table" which we needed for the next construction stage – flat assembly of the front and back walls and gable ends.

Nearly at end of Stage 3. Undercroft finshed and ‘I’ beam ground floor joists placed on the walls. Once temporarily floored we had the "table" for Stage 4, the wall assembly.

The undercroft was floored by May 2004.

The next 5 months were spent convincing Building Control that our waste water disposal methods were acceptable, and preparing the next stage of the house.

This stage was the painstaking final cutting and pre-assembly of the 500+ I beam wall and rafter pieces which were each individually labelled according to drawings and the cutting plan and stacked in the undercroft.

Stage 4. Assembled back and front walls lying on the "table". All the gable ends had been cut, temporarily assembled, taken apart and re-stacked in the undercroft.

All that sort of handling takes so much time, but care in preparation pays off later!

By November 2004, we got our second stage building warrant which meant we could have a house raising!

Stage 4. The house raising! Starting with the back wall – raised by ropes, pulley and five chaps.

View from west showing front and back frames erected and some gable studs in place

Stage 4 continued….all but the apex of the gable end sheathed with Panel vent.

 

The house frame was completely erected, sheathed and the roof membrane was on by the end of December 2004. It looked like a giant cardboard box!

However, it was not fully nailed together and the gable ends were only secured by nylon ropes to handy birch trees! The January 2005 gales were a worrying time because we feared the house would turn back into a pile of boards and beams. Thankfully, it survived, though the roof membrane was re-fitted a few times.

Most of 2005 has been concerned with finishing Stage 4, making the house wind and water tight.

The roof was slated (local reclaimed slates). All the flashings, soakers, window sills and gable end dry-verges have been made on site from 0.4mm stainless steel to avoid any heavy metal contamination of the rainwater because we will be drinking it eventually. Steel roofing is common on mainland Europe but here few people know the craft, so it has involved a whole new raft of learning for Andy.

 

Initial cutting of the steel, folding to strengthen edges and get the basic shapes were done by a local firm. Here, Andy is doing the final bends and soldering corners for a flashing round a roof light.

 

 

Fakro rooflight showing stainless steel soakers and flashings

The roof lights are made by Fakro rather than Velux. They were a better price but also the handles are on the bottom edge meaning short people can reach to open them! The windows, external doors and sun room glazing are made by Vrogum in Denmark. They are double glazed, argon filled, low emissivity and made from sustainable hardwood.

Early stage for the cladding –larch logs at the mill

The walls are externally clad in larch which has been sourced and milled locally. Sadly, the mill didn’t get the hang of our instructions – which was to mill to boards from the heartwood and avoid the soft sapwood. We have therefore had to chuck a lot of the boards (chicken sheds perhaps…).

Putting the cladding on is an exacting business to make it function properly as a rain screen and also look good. We are paying considerable attention to the detailing at the corners and round openings – it’s where many wood clad buildings are let down. But its worth it – it looks great. Although pinkish at the moment, it will weather naturally silver and be a nice fit to the woodland setting.

 

West end view - vertical larch board-on-batten over the sheathing shown above, to give appearance of a flush surface. The rough sawn boards are machined to give a smarter finish – more suited to a dwelling house. Under the gable it will be horizontally clad to give some variation to the design

Its difficult to show the inside but the first floor joists are in place, a sub-floor is down and the insulation has been blown in the roof and upstairs walls. The upstairs space is wonderful.

 

Front view December 2005. Shows the glazed area or bay window (covered in polythene), the black external membrane (Solitex) and some larch cladding stacked in front and against the wall…The black area in the roof is not slated but is corrugated Onduline, on which some of the PV will sit.

 

This is now January 2006 and the house is close to finishing stage 4. There have inevitably been hitches, mistakes and difficulties. Some of the material sourcing has been very time consuming and frustrating. - the UK building industry is not well clued up on sustainable materials, suppliers don’t return calls and hauliers are slow with delivery.

 

13 March 2006: At last the ‘bay-window’ and glazed roof are in place, still a bit of fine tuning needed and the sills fitting but no more drips inside. Completion of the Warmcell installation also done so at last a cosy place to work.

 

And costings ? Well, so far we are within budget on materials, but well over on labour! The next job is to source and buy all the photovoltaic kit which will be the third biggest expense, estimated at about £5000. This should mean a pay-back time of about 15 years, although with fuel prices rising this may be even less!

Watch this space….updates and more technical information (hopefully) to follow…...

 

 

Edenhope’s Affordability Background

 

As Sarah says in the build story – if we could just go out and buy one of these houses we wouldn’t be building it. We’ll try to give an idea of what ‘one of these houses’ means.

Our starting point was that we wanted to live in a house consistent with being environmentally affordable as well as financially affordable, an idea given form following Gokay Deveci’s model for affordable rural housing. Our solution is a design which is not only affordable in both respects but is easily replicable without needing specialised skills or hard to source materials – in many respects a commoditised solution.

One of our requirements is that we want our miniscule pensions to go a long way. Having an interesting life doesn’t lead to a big pension so minimising bills is of great interest. Making its own power using photovoltaic panels, collecting its own water from the roof and treating its effluent make their contributions as do the zero-heating design low or zero maintenance finishes and the ‘healthy building’ materials.

The most unaffordable element of the whole project is the very high price we would have had to have paid if we had not been able to research and design it ourselves. We have kept the fee load to relatively low levels largely by limiting consultants to inspection and certification (neither of us has a relevant qualification). Consultants, like architects and engineers, in general aren’t used to working this way in the UK. It was a bit of a struggle sometimes to get them to do what we rather than they wanted and in some cases impossible to get and keep their interest at all. Their professionalism seems to be extremely limited.